Click here for the video lesson.
Several lessons ago, when we talked about prepositional phrases, I said the groups of words that compose a sentence can be divided into two groups: phrases and clauses. Let’s review some terms:
A phrase is a group of words. Phrases can have contain verbs, nouns, modifiers, and connectors, but they do not usually have a predicate and subject. Rather, phrases add detail to clauses. So far, we’ve seen prepositional phrases, and any time we’ve had a verb that required more than one word to express its action (a verb in the past or future tense, for instance), we saw a verb phrase.
Now, let’s start to think about clauses.
A clause is a group of words with a predicate and a subject that work together to express a thought. A clause can have a lot of other parts beside a predicate and subject, but if there’s no predicate and subject, there’s no clause. Clauses, essentially, are units of thought. Clauses come in two basic types:
Independent Clauses
Dependent (also called subordinate) Clauses
Independent clauses are usually defined as expressing a complete thought. If you have a group of words with a subject and verb and you can put it a period at the end of it, it’s an independent clause.
A dependent (or subordinate) clause, meanwhile, is groups of words with a subject and verb that requires more information to be complete. Some dependent clauses help set the scene for another action, and sometimes dependent clauses help complete another thought.
These definitions give us a good start, but sometimes they feel a little ambiguous, so it helps to recognize some tell-tale clues. Here are a couple hints that might make things clearer to you:
1. Dependent clauses always start with a word that makes them incomplete. The first word tells us the clause depends on the rest of the sentence for its idea. Consider this example:
When I was walking my dog yesterday
The predicate in the example is “was walking.”
Who or what was walking? I. I is the subject.
We know we have a clause because we a predicate and a subject. That said, if I say this group of words aloud and stop after “yesterday” as if I were at the end of a sentence, my listener is likely to say “What happened?” The first word in this clause, “when,” makes this clause dependent, because it implies that the action in this clause is going to be interrupted by something else. The something else will appear in the independent clause:
When I was walking my dog yesterday, I tripped and scraped my knee.
In the example above, I continued the thought from the dependent clause and added an independent clause to say what happened when I was walking my dog.
Interestingly, if I omit the first word from the clause as follows:
I was walking my dog yesterday
I now have an independent clause. We could (and later will) have a whole conversation on that -ing verb, but leaving that aside for now, if we omit the word “when,” we have a thought that can stand alone.
2. Dependent clauses often sound like questions or like the answer to a question. This is a corollary to hint number 1. The first word of a dependent clause is often an interrogative word, even though the clause is not actually asking a question. If you consider the dependent clause out of context, though, it might sound like a question. Consider this example:
The little girl wondered where the best seashells could be found.
Let’s pick out main parts.
First, look for prepositional phrases. Lucky for us, there aren’t any.
Then underline verbs.
The little girl wondered where the best seashells could be found.
Next we see if the verbs have subjects.
Wondered. Who or what wondered? The little girl.
Could be found. Who or what could be found? Seashells.
Both verbs are predicates, and they have two separate subjects, so they are part of two separate clauses. Notice, there is an interrogative word, “where,” before the clause containing “could be found.” That word introduces the dependent clause. “Where the best seashells could be found” sounds like a question that is worded wrong. That is how we know it is dependent. In fact, it is the complement of the verb “wondered.”
The little girl wondered what? Where the best seashells could be found.
Remember, a phrase or clause is a group of words that works together to do a job in a sentence. While each word in our dependent clause has its own job, the entire clause is actually a main part of the independent clause.
Let’s look at one more complex sentence to see how clauses work together.
What the students didn’t know was that there would be a quiz the next day.
We all say things like this all the time without thinking, but when we pause to analyze it, we realize we are masters of complexity without even knowing it.
This sentence has a bunch of verbs close together. In this case, even though “know” and “was” are next to each other, they aren’t part of the same verb phrase. The reason is that “know” can’t be a helping verb, and the main verb of a verb phrase is always the last verb. That means “know” and “was” must be separate verbs. Very tricky.
Didn’t know. Who didn’t know? The students
Was. What was? What the students didn’t know.
Remember how I said a whole group of words can work together in a phrase to do a job? Here, the whole groups of words, “what the students didn’t know,” is the logical answer to the question “what was?”
Would be. What would be? A quiz
I bet you thought “there” was the subject of “would be.” It’s right there! In front of the verb! Except, “there” doesn’t actually answer the question “What would be?” There is a modifier (specifically, an adverb). Whenever “there” appears before a verb, the subject will be after the verb. You can memorize this, or you can slow down, ask the subject question, and think carefully about the logical answer!
We have three clauses in this sentence, because we have three separate verbs with predicates. In a super tricky feat of grammar, the first dependent clause “what the students didn’t know” is the subject of “was,” and the second dependent clause “that there would be a quiz” is the complement of “was,” so both dependent clauses are completely necessary for the independent clause’s meaning.
The first dependent clause, “What the students didn’t know” sounds like a question, starting with “what.” Just like our previous examples, if we omit “what,” we are left with “the students didn’t know,” which can be a complete thought.
The second dependent clause, “that there would be a quiz the next day,” sounds like the answer to a question, beginning with “that.” Again, if we omit “that,” we have a thought that can stand alone: “There would be a quiz the next day.” It’s kind of weird to have the verb “would be” in this sentence, but there are contexts in which it would make sense and stand alone as a thought.
Click here for Exercise 3 to practice picking out main parts and identifying dependent and independent clauses.



